
"[T]he Hispanic baby boom is certain to produce more juvenile delinquents, more school failure, more welfare use, and more teen pregnancy in the future." MacDonald - 2006
On November 25, 2008, LatinoJustice filed a complaint with the United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division against Suffolk County government on behalf of the county's Latino residents for violating their rights to equal protection and fomenting a climate of intimation, fear and hate.The effect of this inadequate, discriminatory treatment has been to allow crimes against Latinos to flourish.The complaint linked here does a very good job of detailing Mr. Levy's lead role in a promoting a hostile environment -- leading to numerous attacks on Latinos and culminating in the murder of Marcelo Lucero.
The defeat of the comprehensive and humane changes to immigration laws was the triumph of a deafening slander that never met much resistance.This outcome forces us to think of the strategy for the next steps toward an immigration reform that considers legalization for the millions of working families who, from the shadows of illegality, contribute to the well-being of Americans. This year the topic of immigration reform in Washington is dead, despite attempts by a group of Republican senators to revive only the most restrictive clauses, and by piecemeal provisions that deserve to succeed, introducing the bills AgJobs and the DREAM Act in budget-related measures.
Whatever frustrations officials of the City of Hazleton may feel about the current state of federal immigration enforcement, the nature of the political system in the United States prohibits the City from enacting ordinances that disrupt a carefully drawn federal statutory scheme. Even if federal law did not conflict with Hazleton’s measures, the City could not enact an ordinance that violates rights the Constitution guarantees to every person in the United States, whether legal resident or not.
The genius of our Constitution is that it provides rights even to those who evoke the least sympathy from the general public. In that way, all in this nation can be confident of equal justice under its laws.
Hazleton, in its zeal to control the presence of a group deemed undesirable, violated the rights of such people, as well as others within the community. Since the United States Constitution protects even the disfavored, the ordinances cannot be enforced.
Judge: Defendant seems to argue that the law is constitutional because it is aimed at illegal aliens who have no right to be in the United States. Defendant’s position fails to acknowledge that the law will affect more than illegal aliens. It will affect every employer, every employee who is challenged as an illegal alien and every prospective employee especially those who look or act as if they are foreign.Since many other towns adopted the Hazelton anti-immigrant housing codes, it's expected that those other laws will also be challenged.